PRODUCT ANALYSIS — PENSION SAVINGS

KBC Pricos — is the 30% tax benefit really worth it?

Belgium's most popular pension savings fund. Let's unpack what the brochure doesn't say.

IN BRIEF

KBC Pricos charges 2% upfront + ~1.41%/year in management fees. Over 30 years of contributions at the tax maximum (€1,050/year), this costs you more than €44,000 compared to a Global ETF — that's 140 times your annual tax benefit of €315. If you are under 45, this product destroys your long-term wealth.

Your banker's pitch is compelling: invest 1 050 € per year, the State refunds you 315 € via your taxes — an immediate return of 30%, guaranteed.

That's technically true in the first year. But pension savings is a 30–40 year marathon. And over that time, KBC Asset Management's fees do a quiet and devastating job.

The product sheet

ProductKBC Pricos Responsible Investing
TypePension savings fund (Branch 23)
ManagerKBC Asset Management
Tax cap1 050 €/year (30% reduction)
Entry fees2.00%
Annual TER1.53%
Annualised net return~4.3% to 4.5% (last 10 years)
AvailabilityLocked until age 60
Exit tax8% on notional capital at 4.75%/year

The anatomy of fees

To understand why this product underperforms, you need to look at the stacking of fees:

Entry fees — 2%

On a payment of 1 050 €, KBC immediately takes 21 €. Only 1 029 € is actually invested. You start each year with a return of -2%.

Annual management fees (TER) — 1.53%

The silent killer. These fees apply every year to your entire accumulated capital — not just your new contributions.

The effect over 30 years: on a capital of 60 000 €, 1.53% represents 918 € in annual fees. Fees that would themselves have compounded at 8% if invested in an ETF.

⚠ The cumulative effect of fees over 30 years is non-linear. A TER of 1.53% does not reduce your final capital by 1.53% × 30 = 46%. It reduces it by more than 60% compared to an ETF at 0.17% TER, due to the effect of compound interest.

The final blow: the exit tax at age 60

The least-known feature of Belgian pension savings: the 8% advance levy taken at age 60 is not calculated on your actual capital.

The State calculates it on a notional capital, assuming your fund has returned 4.75% per year from day one.

The problem: KBC Pricos often struggles to reach 4.75% net of fees. You therefore pay 8% tax on gains you may never have actually realised.

Concrete example:

  • 30 years of contributions at 1 050 €/year.
  • Notional capital at 4.75%: ~68 000 €
  • 8% tax due: ~5 440 €
  • Actual capital at 3% net return: ~50 000 €
  • Effective tax rate on your real gains: ~29%

The more your fund underperforms relative to the notional rate of 4.75%, the more punitive your effective tax rate.

ETF ADVANTAGE — TAX FLEXIBILITY

Unlike KBC's 8% tax (taken in one shot, unavoidably, at age 60), the 10% capital gains tax on ETFs offers real flexibility: by selling gradually over several years in retirement, you benefit each year from the €10 000 exemption. In practice, your effective real rate can fall to 2–3% — making the comparison even more favourable to ETFs than the figures in the next section show.

The 30-year match

Let's compare the mathematical reality over 30 years, with the tax cap of 1 050 €/year (87.50 €/month). Total paid out of pocket: 31 500 €.

KBC PricosIMIE ETF
Entry fees2,00%0%
Annual TER1,53%0,17%
Estimated return~4.3%/yr~8%/yr
Gross capital (30 years)~62 800 €~132 400 €
Exit tax-5 347 €
TOB on sale-158 €
CGT 2026 (10%)-9 090 €
Tax benefit+9 450 €0 €
FINAL NET VALUE~66 900 €~123 152 €
REAL NET GAIN+35 400 €+91 652 €

The Global ETF generates more than double the real profits — even accounting for the new 2026 capital gains tax and the absence of a tax benefit.

From this point, every additional year with KBC costs you more in fees than it earns you in tax benefit. Simulation for illustrative purposes only.

* Methodological note: KBC Pricos's 4.3% return is based on its last 10 years, an exceptionally favourable decade for equity markets. Over that same period, IMIE actually delivered ~10–11%/year — well above the 8% we use here. We use 8% to remain consistent with our long-term projections (20 years), which smooth out bull and bear cycles. In other words: this comparison favours KBC Pricos. Based on actual returns over the last 10 years, the gap would be even wider.

Simulate with your own numbers in our calculator — KBC Pricos is included as a comparison product.

Open the calculator →

The Hybrid Strategy — A Mathematical Myth

This is the most sophisticated argument for Pricos: the 'hybrid' strategy. The idea: invest 1 050 €/year with KBC, get back 315 € in tax, and reinvest it in a Global ETF. You capture both the tax bonus AND ETF performance. Note: these 315 € only exist if you choose Pricos. This argument deserves rigorous analysis.

The verdict after 30 years

Option A: Hybrid (Pricos + Side-pot ETF)

~89 610 € net

Option B: Pure Global ETF

~123 310 € net

Gap: ~33 700 € in favour of the pure ETF strategy.

The illusion of the tax bonus

Pricos's net bonus is actually 294 € (315 € minus 21 € in entry fees). This amount is fixed. In contrast, the fee gap (1.53% vs 0.17%) and return difference applies to your total capital, which grows every year. The opportunity cost eventually crushes the bonus.

YearAnnual ETF growth surplusNet bonusAnnual difference
1+39 €294 €+255 € hybrid
5+280 €294 €+14 € hybrid
6+350 €294 €+56 € ETF
10+650 €294 €+356 € ETF
20+1 800 €294 €+1 506 € ETF
30+4 200 €294 €+3 906 € ETF

An even weaker argument for Pricos

Due to the 2% entry fees and a higher TER, the crossover point arrives as early as year 5 or 6. Even for a short horizon, the hybrid argument collapses faster. If you insist on this strategy, at least use Argenta.

The 315 €/year bonus is real. But it is fixed and does not compound. The return gap between a Global ETF and Pricos does compound — and surpasses it around year 5.

Pension savings: a dead end for most

The numbers are clear: for the vast majority of savers, KBC Pricos is a financial dead end compared to passive investment.

If you are under 50, KBC Pricos is structurally losing against a simple Global ETF.

⚖ Our verdict

KBC Pricos should be avoided. It is one of the worst-performing pension savings products on the Belgian market due to its aggressive fee stacking.

The only exception: those over 50–55 with a short horizon (10–15 years). In this specific case, the tax bonus doesn't have time to be entirely consumed by fees. But even in this scenario, Argenta (0% entry) is consistently superior.

Borderline acceptable for:

Investors aged 50+ looking for an immediate tax bonus over a very short horizon.

Avoid for:

Anyone under 45. The opportunity cost versus an ETF is massive.

I've already subscribed to KBC Pricos — what now?

1

Stop all new contributions to KBC Pricos immediately.

Every euro contributed today still pays 2% entry fees + feeds a fee machine of 1.41%/year. The 315 € tax benefit does not compensate for this cost over the long term.

2

Redirect your 1 050 €/year to a Global ETF via a fee-free broker.

MeDirect or Saxo Bank (AutoInvest) allow you to invest automatically, with no entry fees, with stock exchange tax handled automatically. Your money already at KBC: leave it to grow until age 60 (withdrawing it now costs more than leaving it).

In summary: don't touch the money already invested. But don't put another cent in.

Last updated: April 2026

← Back to product analyses