Anti-US
Reducing exposure to the United States
For investors who want to significantly reduce their dependence on the United States (which represents ~65% of a World ETF). Diversifies towards Europe and China.
Key facts
China weighed on returns over this period (~4%/year). This strategy is forward-looking and not optimised for past performance
Portfolio composition
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (Acc)
ISIN: IE00B4L5Y983
iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
ISIN: IE00B4K48X80
iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
ISIN: IE00BJ5JPG56
Average yearly return
Index · EUR · gross · past performanceSource: MSCI World (60%) + MSCI Europe (20%) + MSCI China (20%) blend (EUR). Annualized returns to end-2025, EUR, gross of Belgian taxes (TOB, précompte mobilier, CGT) and ETF fees (TER). Past performance does not guarantee future results.
* Return calculated from weighted underlying indices. May differ slightly from actual ETF performance.
Why this strategy?
- 1Drastic reduction of US exposure: in a classic world ETF, the United States represents ~70%. Here, via IWDA (60%) + overweighting Europe (20%) + China (20%), the effective US share drops to about 42%.
- 20.12% TOB on the three ETFs: IWDA, SMEA, and ICHN are all subject to the reduced 0.12% TOB in Belgium.
- 3Multi-regional diversification: this strategy bets on the convergence between developed economies (Europe, Japan via IWDA) and catch-up economies (China) to reduce dependence on a single market.
- 4100% accumulating funds: all dividends are automatically reinvested, without withholding tax.
Alternatives & comparisons
iShares MSCI World + iShares Core MSCI EM IMI
Advantages
- +Broader emerging exposure (not just China)
- +Only 2 ETFs to manage
- +Better 20-year history
Disadvantages
- −China less overweighted (~6% vs 20% here)
- −Less precise geographical control
State Street SPDR MSCI All Country World Investable Market UCITS ETF (Acc)
Advantages
- +All-in-one solution, zero management
- +Includes small caps and emerging markets in natural proportions
Disadvantages
- −US at ~65% — less reduction than this strategy
- −No regional overweighting possible